Title |
The loss of extension test (LOE test): a new clinical sign for the anterior cruciate ligament insufficient knee
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10195-013-0238-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Massimiliano Salvi, Francesco Caputo, Giuseppe Piu, Marco Sanna, Cristina Sanna, Giuseppe Marongiu |
Abstract |
This prospective study was created to evaluate the reliability of a new clinical test, which we termed the "loss of extension test" (LOE test). The LOE test investigates the loss of normal maximum passive extension (MPE) of the knee due to an anterior cruciate ligament tear in comparison to the normal MPE of the healthy knee. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 54% |
Georgia | 2 | 15% |
Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 1 | 1% |
Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 73 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 16% |
Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
Researcher | 8 | 11% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
Other | 14 | 18% |
Unknown | 22 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 46% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 9% |
Sports and Recreations | 5 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
Psychology | 1 | 1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 27 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2015.
All research outputs
#3,532,367
of 25,330,051 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
#23
of 221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,461
of 206,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,330,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 221 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.