| Title |
Aftershock activity of the 2015 Gorkha, Nepal, earthquake determined using the Kathmandu strong motion seismographic array
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Earth, Planets and Space, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40623-016-0402-8 |
| Authors |
Masayoshi Ichiyanagi, Nobuo Takai, Michiko Shigefuji, Subeg Bijukchhen, Tsutomu Sasatani, Sudhir Rajaure, Megh Raj Dhital, Hiroaki Takahashi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 19% |
| Researcher | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 30% |
| Unknown | 4 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 56% |
| Engineering | 3 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2016.
All research outputs
#2,917,894
of 22,912,409 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#107
of 1,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,920
of 298,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#4
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,912,409 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.