@bibleradioapp @IOtsuki Here, read this. https://t.co/yMLilUApnj
@bibleradioapp If the theory of evolution violated physics, then, why do most physicists and studies of physics support it btw Better read this then : https://t.co/AzkDYxkaM9
@wauftt1 @NotEvolution1 https://t.co/zTWHdZZMaE. First thing I found when I searched. What is your background on thermodynamics?
@bibleradioapp @FFRF Since you are too lazy. https://t.co/Xzrb3zgtSF
@whm3113 @RedPillAlive Uh, no. https://t.co/LGL3OijCXv.
@leroyb756 https://t.co/4Ua1lihTUg Interesting long article about how the laws of thermodynamics came about and how evolution proponents misunderstand these laws. And how these laws are actually part of how evolution works.
This is cool. Like really cool. Science is awesome.
RT @doofgeek4011: @JustRickard The 2nd law of thermo. says that the likelihood of finding the isolated system in its original or any given…
@JustRickard The 2nd law of thermo. says that the likelihood of finding the isolated system in its original or any given state tends to approach the likelihood of finding it in any other state. It holds for systems that are thermally isolated & not in
@bibleradioapp @ScienceQriosity @NotEvolution1 @Abolition__Now Remember it is Figure 2 in this SCIENTIFIC paper=--> https://t.co/4pvOto5wug https://t.co/1ZYdmA8BNa
RT @ScientiaPercept: @bibleradioapp @ScienceQriosity @NotEvolution1 @Abolition__Now Oh, you mean THIS image (Figure 2) from this scientific…
@bibleradioapp @ScienceQriosity @NotEvolution1 @Abolition__Now Oh, you mean THIS image (Figure 2) from this scientific paper=--> https://t.co/4pvOto5wug "Evolution and the Second Law of Thermodynamics: Effectively Communicating to Non-technicians" geare
@bibleradioapp @NotEvolution1 All of them, start with entropy, evolution does not violate the law of entropy any more than building a house does. Perhaps this will help https://t.co/nMNKotnWWS.
@nospikinglish @antallan @CatzillaSue @McClureShawn You keep banging on about thermodynamics as if it were some sort of gotcha. I have posted this in another reply to you — let me know when you've read and understood it? Just trying to save you from embarr
@nospikinglish @RamonDeKoning2 @NotEvolution1 Here's a pretty solid explanation of how thermodynamics (and hence entropy) does and does not feature in the process of evolution. https://t.co/WYTavdZBcl
@bibleradioapp Again this is a misunderstanding of science and physical principles. Entropy is actually a necessary driving force for evolution. Its required for mutations to occur, so this argument it debunks evolution is ironic. https://t.co/wB3xvi5riu
@bibleradioapp @GreekVikingX @AndrewBorn1968 @CJTitan3 @Lilith_Atheist This is a great paper that shows us how entropy is actually the driving factor in evolution and natural selection https://t.co/OM1Np4DeLC.
@bibleradioapp @GreenSockNinja @darwintojesus As if ignorant jackasses like you actually care about truth. You get hit with facts, then reply with nothing more than “cope” like an immature child. Isn’t it interesting how religiosity decreases with intell
@bibleradioapp @SatansAvocado77 Typical response of an idiot that doesn’t care whether or not what he believes is true. If you did, you wouldn’t have such a pathetic and childish response like this. Peer reviewed research debunking your same exact ignora
@NotEvolution1 “We show that entropy, far from opposing evolution, is a thermodynamic driving force that propels natural selection, the mechanism of evolution.” https://t.co/p1voGclXug.
@SergeantLeo @GreekVikingX @WineDine69__ @Bearzfan13 @blessedpeasant0 @wendelltalks @Crayola Why did you avoid the tweet above where I do link to it? https://t.co/iG0Vd8ozFQ You had to have seen it as it's above the one you're replying to. So why did you
@SergeantLeo @GreekVikingX @WineDine69__ @Bearzfan13 @blessedpeasant0 @wendelltalks @Crayola https://t.co/Bi9UytengN. I thought you knew this.
@Stripey @elonmusk "Entropy rules out evolution" If you're suggesting that evolution is not true because of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, you're wrong. Did you bother doing five minutes of research? https://t.co/yAZDR8K2Z5
@flameshod @ThinkingAtheist It’s not abrupt change, it’s more like how the geological formation of earth changed over time. Genetic entropy? Nope. https://t.co/aniNh8mViS “Respiration (lungs) between reptile and bird etc…,” says who? How quickly would it
@OntologicalMax @Just_an_oi @elonmusk Evolution and the Second Law of Thermodynamics: Effectively Communicating to Non-technicians https://t.co/oCzmpD4Be6 https://t.co/I6qCUNf5TZ
In an article discussing evolution and entropy, Schreiber & Gimbel describe the enclosed but not isolated systems of the earth and of individual organisms. https://t.co/iv5t55pV4e https://t.co/K6qAxdaxAP
@FranciKing15848 @autocorrect2_0 Educate yourself: https://t.co/IA71ZVRwq7
@CaanaadaaBenjo @Moose95924542 @extinctnepal @MAstronomers Oh you are silly. All this constant denial of basic knowledge really does your cause no good at all. There a thousands of articles like the one below. I suggest you read them to gain knowledge and
@SupplyGuy66 If you're talking about the second law of thermodynamics, that argument was debunked AGES ago. https://t.co/ae25tc0BXa
@TBesserwisser @Stripey @TakeThatDarwin @Ah_Science This article describes why some creationists claim that evolution contradicts the second law of thermodynamics and why it actually doesn't. https://t.co/ahDCaUMkXm
@Sweetemmilyn @babygoobie @john_m_b @EvoIutlon Your arguments are based on misunderstandings of evolution and the second law of thermodynamics. https://t.co/h1AgMjOLXG. If anyone wants to read about how evolution is actually consistent with the second law
@Sweetemmilyn @john_m_b @EvoIutlon https://t.co/T1vRSsVVAV You're just regurgitating a tired anti-evolution argument that has already been debunked by actual physicists as merely a fundamental misunderstanding of the 2nd law of thermodynamics.
@ApoloJedi_ Yes heat is energy which we use. Plants convert its light into food. Yes u dont know science or what evolution states. So much that evolutin can be explained via entropy or the 2nd law of thermodynamics if u like. Read, learn, stop stupid https
@bytemaster7 - This apparent conundrum has been resolved by various scientific methods over the past several decades. They can in fact both be true. https://t.co/0tpLNshMpz https://t.co/eu6Np6xlpa
@KenPodrasky @BargeClarissa @erichovind Really? Since you obviously have no understanding, I'll explain it for you. https://t.co/Of83Pn7Xc7
@okiefarm1 @Griffinpours @TJSumpter "The Earth is not a thermally isolated system because it receives constant energy from the Sun. This is the energy fixed by plants using photosynthesis, which is then acquired by herbivores that eat the plants and carniv
@GeraldKehl @smconsult5 So, you don't know what an 'isolated system' is then? Oh look. Some science https://t.co/TyTexECLXX
@SamuelMelton5 @ChipsPlato @hairybadgerIDFK @youngadamc @MahmudHusain15 @Ah_Science It's not a belief, it is a fact explained by entropy, but we all know you don't accept reality as it contradicts your #creationist mythology. https://t.co/4pvOto64jO http
@NeilMalloy40 @JasonMKelty @umfpt @liberal_parnell @QuantumHawk666 @SebGorka Check out the section in this paper titled "What are organisms and how do they resist entropy." very clear and succinct explanation, shouldn't take you more than a few mins http
@SebGorka You can believe the Earth is a closed entropic system or you can believe we orbit the sun. But NOT both. you moron https://t.co/Uo7MqGLu1l
@CommonSenseHpi @wendelltalks If you're interested in actually learning (although I know you absolutely are not), then have a read: https://t.co/fV82qR49pl.
@LJ63510433 @look2Christ @LJS39124058 @motoldya @historyinmemes I have a saved document url for it Its a fun read, a bit passive agressive actually if you look at it carefully :v https://t.co/ym3S4yH2s9
@look2Christ @LJ63510433 @LJS39124058 @motoldya @historyinmemes I think I see what you mean: entropy You are using the second law of thermodynamics, you must think you are so clever dont ya? I read this a while ago, give it a read yourself https://t.co/
@1689CryptoChad @PlmyOP @TakeThatDarwin Here's a fairly basic explanation of why evolution would not work without entropy. https://t.co/SWiQVktg2J.
@swelenc @TJaytheist @QuispMe Out of context Sean. On Twitter it’s just too much to explain even though I know you jump to enormous conclusions in a single tweet. NEWSFLASH: it’s complicated Sean but you see the full explanation here if you bother to read.
@RavageUniverse @Oleandor7 @NASAJPL Lol ty for follow but I'm more of a reader of twitter not a poster. https://t.co/IKfj5tegLy Read this as it's a good representations of my beliefs on matter then feel free to "debunk"/correct me. 👍
@Newnameel @InvokingTheism This is for you: https://t.co/r150KLOedb
@thejohnkirk @scientist_pop @FraserNelson @GrahamMedley @doug_no1 @TAH_Sci @juji_gatami Evolution can be observed through study, indeed links can be viewed through scientific testing. Evolution does not defy natural laws. https://t.co/pjHkUiy5Xc
@theprospered @TakeThatDarwin @newnerd3 I have to admit that I tend to confuse closed and isolated systems. Sorry for that. Anyway, you are wrong, this has been addressed many times by people who know their shit: https://t.co/g37knaMurw
@JoeShakour @CubeSteve A bit more information to explain you https://t.co/0pnWnXXDgs
Actual Science: https://t.co/OxtEmoRMzn
@StephenCleef @mexidorian1337 @eddieLA4 @liberaldenver @CNN Actual Science: https://t.co/OxtEmoRMzn
@MKULTRAMILF lol, bunch of creationist nonsense https://t.co/4xUzYK94L9
@remofjacob @JoeMDodd85 @zekouse @Aron_Ra @JustinCPorter You need to understand what the laws of thermo means before you can say that: https://t.co/8ZRhtD4hmO
RT @Bellpipe41: @MikeBravoYanky @Canna420Uk @DishonestApe @AiG The most obvious thing to point out is earth is not a closed system. There…
@MikeBravoYanky @Canna420Uk @DishonestApe @AiG The most obvious thing to point out is earth is not a closed system. There are other reasons that go against the alleged incompatibility, but it would be too long to go into on twitter. This link sums it up b
@InamBerea @cgp42 @TakeThatDarwin @patprendergast3 @MrMongala @DrFrankTurek “The second law of thermodynamics clearly does not prohibit the building of complexity from simplicity, hence the existence of complex structures like termite mounds and toaster ov
@InamBerea @patprendergast3 @alienward1 @MrMongala @DrFrankTurek maybe take a few quality moments and read this? https://t.co/suGepZiyDw
@Sadache Have a look https://t.co/fxqbbpL7kq
@klsbkkr @RedFox297 @MalkahFleisher @charliekirk11 That evolution is intuitively incompatible with thermodynamics is actually a fairly common objection. The problem is, it's based on a bit of a misconception of the second law. It's a tad long, but the foll
@DWorldZaWarudo @PortoAncap https://t.co/Z0mAaQxmjH Ainda bem que vc n caiu tão fácil nessa kkkk Quando ver gente comentando esse tipo de coisa pesquisa nos sites americanos sobre isso que vc encontrará informação melhor que aqui no Brasil.
@arndt_eric This might help... https://t.co/ve0EkWjbhX
@SherryODriggers @ZubyMusic Ah, entropy! Well, that relates to the 2nd law of thermodynamics, which only applies in a closed system. The earth is not in a closed system. See here for more info. You’re welcome. Have a good day. https://t.co/1TyOl5khul
@wpcguy Read this: https://t.co/lSkCkQHpge
@djslanty @MzanziLinux @GodBahamut @holykoolaid Well many ppl say evolution breaks the law of entropy, but it doesn't. https://t.co/1Zo58zh2H9
@AnAutist Here is the paper, if you haven’t seen Penrose’s argument, it is brilliant in its simplicity, far easier to understand than Seth Lloyd’s explanation of algorithmic complexity, which is describing the same phenomenon. https://t.co/i0cbwyNp
RT @rkdoctr: You have failed to understand one critical point. Evolution is a fact. https://t.co/qMAzFsoeTT The second law isn’t what you…
RT @rkdoctr: You have failed to understand one critical point. Evolution is a fact. https://t.co/qMAzFsoeTT The second law isn’t what you…
You have failed to understand one critical point. Evolution is a fact. https://t.co/qMAzFsoeTT The second law isn’t what you think. https://t.co/U7xfJEHp75
@BrynGerard @global_sharing @SolutionsMag We don’t need massive energy sources, one day we will, but what we are doing is miniaturising, shrinking and increasing efficiency of everything we make. When I first read this account of the origin and evolution