| Title |
Properties of fibre reinforced concrete using recycled fibres from carpet industrial waste
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science, September 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00414198 |
| Authors |
Youjiang Wang, Abdul-Hamid Zureick, Baik-Soon Cho, D. E. Scott |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pakistan | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 55 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 23% |
| Researcher | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 11 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 28 | 49% |
| Materials Science | 4 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1997.
All research outputs
#7,494,138
of 22,908,162 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#935
of 4,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,709
of 60,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#35
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,908,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,617 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.