@Stefferi @orastynkkynen @A_Ahokas 2003 arvioitu globaaliksi RFR:ksi 2,33 tässä tutkimuksessa, mutta varmasti tullut sittemmin alas siitä. https://t.co/36fj4Ojh4P
RT @Anne_red_head: "It is frequently assumed by the general public and also by some population experts that the value of replacement-level…
"It is frequently assumed by the general public and also by some population experts that the value of replacement-level fertility is everywhere an average of 2.1 lifetime births per woman. Nothing could be farther from the truth" https://t.co/1fTZwLCogq
"It is frequently assumed by the general public and also by some population experts that the value of replacement-level fertility is everywhere an average of 2.1 lifetime births per woman. Nothing could be farther from the truth" https://t.co/1fTZwLCogq
@GaumigsJoks @LeonardsKirsis @lastguru_net @OttoOzols @janisnezinamais @normundsbergs @Jauna_Vienotiba Vnk nevajag dzīvit pagātnē. Lūk arī daži jaunākie pētījumi. https://t.co/xFJZ95USME
@ticobas The replacement value varies greatly between developed and developing countries. For some reason Lancet has given the standard average rate for developed countries. The last comprehensive study of this, in 2003, found a global average of 2.33. htt
Dicas Urso Demografia: Se alguém disser que a taxa de reposição populacional é de exatamente 2,1 filhos, acenda a luz de alerta. https://t.co/3QCRKkLtN9
@timurkuran Exactly? https://t.co/3QCRKkLtN9
RT @lymanstoneky: Your regular reminder that the *actual* replacement rate of fertility ranges from 2.01 to 3.5 depending on country. https…
Your regular reminder that the *actual* replacement rate of fertility ranges from 2.01 to 3.5 depending on country. https://t.co/DJmNZ27w9K
Replacement fertility rate is not always 2.1 children per woman- it can be as high as 3.5 in developing countries https://t.co/bJY3G6uPwq