↓ Skip to main content

Determinants of Trade Misinvoicing

Overview of attention for article published in Open Economies Review, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 194)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Determinants of Trade Misinvoicing
Published in
Open Economies Review, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11079-011-9214-4
Authors

Ila Patnaik, Abhijit Sen Gupta, Ajay Shah

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 8 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 10 28%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 17%
Social Sciences 6 17%
Arts and Humanities 2 6%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2018.
All research outputs
#1,312,609
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from Open Economies Review
#8
of 194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,205
of 133,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Economies Review
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them