↓ Skip to main content

Chronic histopathological consequences of fluid-percussion brain injury in rats: effects of post-traumatic hypothermia

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, January 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
172 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Chronic histopathological consequences of fluid-percussion brain injury in rats: effects of post-traumatic hypothermia
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, January 1997
DOI 10.1007/s004010050602
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen M. Bramlett, W. Dalton Dietrich, Edward J. Green, Raul Busto

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 29%
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 14%
Professor 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 37%
Neuroscience 7 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2009.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#1,519
of 2,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,962
of 92,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.