RT @transitharmony: @SciecoRose Because parking is expensive and limited. “parking subsidies greatly increase solo driving. When employers…
RT @transitharmony: @SciecoRose Because parking is expensive and limited. “parking subsidies greatly increase solo driving. When employers…
RT @transitharmony: @SciecoRose Because parking is expensive and limited. “parking subsidies greatly increase solo driving. When employers…
RT @transitharmony: @SciecoRose Because parking is expensive and limited. “parking subsidies greatly increase solo driving. When employers…
@AnthonyMKreis Yes. And academics should especially agree.
@SarahWest382 @PSBROOKES @SciecoRose You can say that about most jobs. Doesn’t mean employers should further subsidize cars. Research shows subsidized parking really affects travel behavior. https://t.co/kQFEJTVbQI
@ASchmittner @SciecoRose It is what the research says
@SciecoRose Because parking is expensive and limited. “parking subsidies greatly increase solo driving. When employers reduce or remove parking subsidies, a significant number of solo drivers shift to carpools and/or transit” https://t.co/kQFEJTVbQI
@SmallWhale13 @godkatesusall Parking subsidies greatly increase solo driving. This has been known for 30 years. https://t.co/PDtwQDxOWE So, yes, a carrot of a paid bus pass would be even better. But I still stand by the notion that employers everywhere (