↓ Skip to main content

Suspended Sediment, C, N, P, and Si Yields from the Mississippi River Basin

Overview of attention for article published in Hydrobiologia, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Suspended Sediment, C, N, P, and Si Yields from the Mississippi River Basin
Published in
Hydrobiologia, January 2004
DOI 10.1023/b:hydr.0000014031.12067.1a
Authors

R. Eugene Turner, Nancy N. Rabalais

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 5%
Unknown 74 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 22%
Researcher 16 21%
Student > Master 10 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 9%
Professor 7 9%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 8 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 27 35%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 22 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 17%
Engineering 2 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 10 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2008.
All research outputs
#8,784,015
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Hydrobiologia
#1
of 5 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,087
of 145,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrobiologia
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.8. This one scored the same or higher as 4 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.