Now consider this MA of isocaloric substitution trials: https://t.co/yxft6jPPI0 Fructose was exchanged for other CHO under energy-matched conditions. We can see that fructose has no uniquely harmful effect, when it’s substituted in place of other sugars
@ancetetere Principā izskatās, ka fruktoze veseliem cilvēkiem var būt kas slikts kad tā tiek uzņemta lielos daudzumos (jo ekstra enerģija) vai arī no pārstrādātiem produktiem (piem. limonādēm)https://t.co/30Gvv7ICdH https://t.co/j2885f9Yzc https://t.co/KLq
✅ไม่อยากให้กล้วมันแต่เราต้องจัดการกับมันเป็น มันไม่ได้ทำให้อักเสบโว้ยยยยยยยยยยยยยยย🔥🔥 เอกสารฉบับเต็ม systematic reviews and meta-analyses : https://t.co/gtah9HYGYn
@sean_bernstein While I agree we need to cut down on added sugars to state if contributes to most chronic diseases is a misnomer unless you’re referring to caloric intake. https://t.co/EkyjxFQRch
砂糖に関する論争: 肥満、心血管代謝疾患、糖尿病に関するシステマティック レビューControversies about sugars: results from systematic reviews and meta-analyses on obesity, cardiometabolic disease a… https://t.co/B91E37RTrZ
"Les sucres contenant du fructose ne peuvent entraîner d'effets néfastes que s'ils apportent des calories en excès. Les études qui ont montré une association négative se limitent aux boissons sucrées qui sont un marqueur d'un mode de vie malsain" https://
RT @vincentturnt: @gina36801021 @AlpacaAurelius Here's more: https://t.co/QaNvJot42M "Fructose-containing sugars can only lead to weight…
@gina36801021 @AlpacaAurelius Here's more: https://t.co/QaNvJot42M "Fructose-containing sugars can only lead to weight gain and other unintended harms on cardiometabolic risk factors insofar as the excess calories they provide." Your theory on sugar cau
急激な血糖値の上昇、糖そのものを肯定してるわけではないですよ😊 文献 https://t.co/vNwiUB0N3V
@theproof @yash_adroja @mario_kratz Substitution trials don’t appear to show adverse effects https://t.co/aO070454Hn The paper you linked had people in an energy surplus with 25% of calories coming from fructose, Is that anything better than mechanistic w
@ACShilton @6thsensemoment In that case I will tell you that there is no evidence fructose is any worse than other sugars when ingested in excess (or in moderation). UofT prof Sievenpiper has done a dozen studies on this. All sugar is equally as bad - maj
RT @omedinacruz: @arodriguezllach Le añado info al debate: 1.El azúcar añadido a las bebibas es más perjudicial que en comidas https://t.c…
@arodriguezllach Le añado info al debate: 1.El azúcar añadido a las bebibas es más perjudicial que en comidas https://t.co/dTwVa9A8Ex 2. Se puede mejorar el diseño del impuesto https://t.co/OyL10STsjS 3. Casi toda la región tiene algún tipo de impuesto, m
@MARlACHIGOTH https://t.co/U8bzPiQnR5 just gonna cite my sources https://t.co/2wh2cjMvk9
@PresidentJRich @MARlACHIGOTH https://t.co/U8bzPiQnR5 nutritional differences like fiber make a difference and I have said that and agree with you? but gram of sugar for gram of sugar they will be exactly the same if you already have the nutritional fiber
@hayitskatiebaby @MARlACHIGOTH https://t.co/U8bzPiQnR5 I literally am an ACE CPT who was a kinesiology major. Anyway here is a peer reviewed study on fructose https://t.co/HZvADLlOBl
@MyNutritionSci @MattMadore576 @Alecsplaining @NutritionMadeS3 @krosenque @ScepticalDoctor @drmatthewnagra @fumimamu @JohnG_UK @TheVeganRD @JackNorrisRD @deirdre_tobias Similar to the fructose story: robust evidence from SR & MA of controlled trials do
@MrFibbers I tried to find something specifically on sugar. This says sugar isn't really different from any other carbohydrate, but that on an individual level removing sugary drinks from your diet is good strategy: https://t.co/XGMlhNs1gI
@ZsoltNagy7 @The_Nutrivore @TheDavidWood The only one embarrasing himself is you. Lustigs mechanistic speculations - like most mechanistic speculations of many highly intelligent individuals - did not hold up under clinical testing: https://t.co/a1cqiQG18T
RT @DrNadolsky: @kevinnbass I think this is one the more recent reviews (there may be others that I’m missing at the moment) - look at the…
RT @BioLayne: Cherry picked studies again. I see your cherry picked studies and raise you several meta-analysis =) https://t.co/kOhMCZE9j8…
RT @DoctorTro: Every time you get pwned, you scream “cherry picked” You made a shitty claim, an inaccurate claim... instead of manning up…
Every time you get pwned, you scream “cherry picked” You made a shitty claim, an inaccurate claim... instead of manning up and admitting it you go through mental gymnastics when you could admit the truth You were wrong
Cherry picked studies again. I see your cherry picked studies and raise you several meta-analysis =) https://t.co/kOhMCZE9j8 https://t.co/PEGW1eZV9O
@RobertLustigMD @nytimes Or just go with actual science. https://t.co/ur9llaMrsj https://t.co/vtMatamTxi
RT @DrNadolsky: @kevinnbass I think this is one the more recent reviews (there may be others that I’m missing at the moment) - look at the…
RT @DrNadolsky: @kevinnbass I think this is one the more recent reviews (there may be others that I’m missing at the moment) - look at the…
@kevinnbass I think this is one the more recent reviews (there may be others that I’m missing at the moment) - look at the RCT portion and CVD risk factors with isocaloric substitution. https://t.co/5EaCVljDFG Interesting regardless and agree we should
@Leicnut I like showing this to remind them total calories matter when it comes to sugar and carbs. It’s usually ignored amidst anecdotes of arcane plant allergies, the “non-essential” nature of carbs, and stories of Arctic keto. https://t.co/ur9llaMrsj h
@FructoseNo Please, somebody, show me where eating carbs in the context of hypo-caloric or maintenance intake (assuming healthy to begin with) is a problem? https://t.co/ur9llaMrsj https://t.co/pjxENEpAQU
@RobertLustigMD @QuitSugarSummit No thanks, I will save time and energy and avoid being part of an anti-sugar cult (another radical splinter cell of exclusionary dietary extremism) and follow what the evidence actually says...albeit that won’t be nearly as
@LukeGromen Misconceptions of sugar https://t.co/cLt6CJ74MI
@moxdzn That's not my area of expertise but here's a peer reviewed study that might help you find the information you're looking for https://t.co/tH2DZUKFay
@BioLayne @pran_dr @uoftmedicine Good summary. https://t.co/vPd5Zu1c4Q
Da story of my life ....🤦🏼♀️ كل يوم نسمع معلومه انو دا الصح والحقيقه مافي شي صح وخلاص وهو دا .
@ascentovalhalla @CakeNutrition @edgefitnessper1 @Caveman_1975 @CanenePhd @ahhite @rustnutrition @Wendi_Irlbeck @StephHfitness @RDValerie @BioLayne @DNSatUofI Fructose on it own is only supported by ecological studies, animal models of overfeeding and sele
@nicklovescode @andrewstepner @mckaywrigley i still dont grok where the sugar fear comes from. my view is similar to this, but happy to be wrong! https://t.co/0GKSDBYoSd
@ChristianTams @erandaw1 I've got an idea "the all sugar diet! " After all, it's only low quality studies and animal models using excess calories that show harm. "Reviews...of the highest quality evidence does not support causal relationships with CMB dis
@MisterDeluxia @Jamesibby_ @tweaksqt @ashIeybtw https://t.co/8frd2LSYU4 Here ill go out of my way to find evidence for your argument. Please give this study a read, i'm sure you'd love it . https://t.co/hNSCBfzt4Q
@jack31315404 @MarkMilliganDPT https://t.co/7Mze9t0wEv "The highest level of evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses of controlled trials has not shown that fructose-containing sugars behave any differently from other ... carbohydrates." Sugar
@Chrest_brett @CakeNutrition @VanDietitians @nutrition_facts It doesn’t bug me that he made the comparison, it bugs me that he made the comparison insinuating one entity is inherently more addictive than the other, no mention of continued controversy. http
Controversies about sugars: results from systematic reviews and meta-analyses on obesity, cardiometabolic disease and diabetes https://t.co/mc1IFoHWKp
No le crean a duque el azucar mata y el no consumo es un marcador de estilo de vida saludable https://t.co/87qpZhUQjI
@joeystampe Her er et par referencer (der ikke er “basic science”): 1. https://t.co/5usKdUrgdc 2. https://t.co/iuWbE2e8Zb 3. https://t.co/f9qxj06NB3 4. https://t.co/RQBoddsTen 5. https://t.co/pBZR3Um2Ae
RT @ZKForTre: @AntJamesMusic @blakestreicher @BioLayne He has provided the disproof, but here's a refresher (or five) anyway... https://t.…
RT @ZKForTre: @AntJamesMusic @blakestreicher @BioLayne He has provided the disproof, but here's a refresher (or five) anyway... https://t.…
Ridiculous joke of an argument against LC diets. There isn’t one low carb diet listed in the first four publications listed? 40% carbs is low carb only in the minds of uninformed. The third study is an isocaloric study which have a bias against diets th
@AntJamesMusic @blakestreicher @BioLayne He has provided the disproof, but here's a refresher (or five) anyway... https://t.co/EMqtPxH0gQ https://t.co/ccxW8cbWN6 https://t.co/pDmm8q4DAi https://t.co/0uLeaFNXIx https://t.co/DUUfxp6BiP Let me know if you'd
Controversies about sugars: results from evidence on obesity, cardiometabolic disease and diabetes #springerlink https://t.co/4bOaxNX1aL
@FITrebelde 2/limitas consumo en T2D cuando yo leo esto: https://t.co/ekCv41tBAr https://t.co/7v5AGCVyJp
@joerogan @danawhite Here are research studies that highlight the equivalence of isocaloric diets- https://t.co/gCszvfyR7d https://t.co/ccxW8cbWN6
RT @RoodenburgA: Systematisch review over suiker onderschrijft focus op suikerhoudende dranken vanwege gezondheidsrisico. https://t.co/7Gcq…
RT @RoodenburgA: Systematisch review over suiker onderschrijft focus op suikerhoudende dranken vanwege gezondheidsrisico. https://t.co/7Gcq…
RT @StephanDenHaag: Review over controverses en consensus suiker en overgewicht. It's the calories, my friend https://t.co/sZzGxRizzl
Review over controverses en consensus suiker en overgewicht. It's the calories, my friend https://t.co/V461GkWzA9
Systematisch review over suiker onderschrijft focus op suikerhoudende dranken vanwege gezondheidsrisico. https://t.co/7GcqPRUzue
Controversies about sugars: results from reviews and meta-analyses on obesity, cardiometabolic disease and diabetes. https://t.co/YECCQiQFfK
"In summary, there is nothing unique about the sugar, fructose. It is harmful when in excess but potentially... https://t.co/0lAJDKRPIx
RT @CPSDA: Systematic review on obesity, cardiometabolic disease & diabetes. Consider whole diet, not just one energy source https://t.co/E…
RT @CPSDA: Systematic review on obesity, cardiometabolic disease & diabetes. Consider whole diet, not just one energy source https://t.co/E…
Systematic review on obesity, cardiometabolic disease & diabetes. Consider whole diet, not just one energy source https://t.co/Esiy60OTeT
RT @ScottRobinson8: Controversies about sugars: results from systematic reviews & meta-analyses Some good take-home msgs in this one! htt…
RT @ScottRobinson8: Controversies about sugars: results from systematic reviews & meta-analyses Some good take-home msgs in this one! htt…
RT @ScottRobinson8: Controversies about sugars: results from systematic reviews & meta-analyses Some good take-home msgs in this one! htt…
RT @ScottRobinson8: Controversies about sugars: results from systematic reviews & meta-analyses Some good take-home msgs in this one! htt…
RT @ScottRobinson8: Controversies about sugars: results from systematic reviews & meta-analyses Some good take-home msgs in this one! htt…
RT @ScottRobinson8: Controversies about sugars: results from systematic reviews & meta-analyses Some good take-home msgs in this one! htt…
"Sugar content should not be the sole determinant of a healthy diet...we should consider the whole diet for health benefits." https://t.co/Nd3Sz9kBqT
RT @ScottRobinson8: Controversies about sugars: results from systematic reviews & meta-analyses Some good take-home msgs in this one! htt…
RT @ScottRobinson8: Controversies about sugars: results from systematic reviews & meta-analyses Some good take-home msgs in this one! htt…
RT @ScottRobinson8: Controversies about sugars: results from systematic reviews & meta-analyses Some good take-home msgs in this one! htt…
RT @ScottRobinson8: Controversies about sugars: results from systematic reviews & meta-analyses Some good take-home msgs in this one! htt…
Controversies about sugars: results from systematic reviews & meta-analyses Some good take-home msgs in this one! https://t.co/pO3wtrJ8vH
An overview of some of the controversies surrounding sugar through systematic reviews and meta analyses. https://t.co/aOBDq6nTOh
RT @Jeukendrup: Bodyweight changes over a 4-year period associated with an increase in the consumption of different food items. Via https:/…
RT @claire_kerins: More evidence for looking at the diet as a whole and not single nutrients https://t.co/lOsfbsIAsK
Systematic review including meta-analyses/systematic reviews on sugar intake and health outcomes: https://t.co/OGtqcoWWjY
One more to add to my masterpost on sugar: https://t.co/ghNQMtwmPr "The... https://t.co/m7yUyKIpT5
El azúcar/fructosa no es dañino para la salud si las calorías consumidas son las adecuadas para cada quien. #azucar https://t.co/PnaWhT4rqK https://t.co/lbmc5Yi0rD
RT @Jeukendrup: Bodyweight changes over a 4-year period associated with an increase in the consumption of different food items. Via https:/…
RT @DrMJoyner: French Fries and Chips are weight gain "bombs"! https://t.co/0nap16IeXg
Tam pietrūkst kopējā konteksta, bet virzienu parāda labi. #FrenchFries https://t.co/E1XomskIjl
RT @Jeukendrup: Bodyweight changes over a 4-year period associated with an increase in the consumption of different food items. Via https:/…
RT @Jeukendrup: Bodyweight changes over a 4-year period associated with an increase in the consumption of different food items. Via https:/…
RT @Jeukendrup: Bodyweight changes over a 4-year period associated with an increase in the consumption of different food items. Via https:/…
RT @Jeukendrup: Bodyweight changes over a 4-year period associated with an increase in the consumption of different food items. Via https:/…