↓ Skip to main content

Defective Colouring of Graphs Excluding A Subgraph or Minor

Overview of attention for article published in Combinatorica, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Defective Colouring of Graphs Excluding A Subgraph or Minor
Published in
Combinatorica, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00493-018-3733-1
Authors

Patrice Ossona De Mendez, Sang-Il Oum, David R. Wood

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 50%
Researcher 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2018.
All research outputs
#15,841,135
of 23,539,593 outputs
Outputs from Combinatorica
#244
of 281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,508
of 332,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Combinatorica
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,539,593 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 281 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them