Direct air capture of CO2 and climate stabilization: A model based assessment

RT @tavoni_massimo: In an early contribution, we showed that accounting for the ocean response to CO2 removal would result in 30% less CDR…

@geoengineering1

In an early contribution, we showed that accounting for the ocean response to CO2 removal would result in 30% less CDR (DAC specifically) https://t.co/VHMfS6Hmpz Part of the first (and now mostly forgotten) special issue on NET with contributions on IAMs,

some research seems to indicate that IAMs (WITCH, IMAGE; TIAM) see DAC more as a complement than a substitute of BECCS. see https://t.co/VHMfS6Hmpz https://t.co/VST3c3lDpr https://t.co/PedtYtFBQE

RT @Peters_Glen: @Paul__Behrens @tavoni_massimo @MCC_Berlin I know of one study (by Massimo): |[W]hen time preference is zero and no discou…

@Paul__Behrens @tavoni_massimo @MCC_Berlin I know of one study (by Massimo): |[W]hen time preference is zero and no discount is applied to future mitigation costs vis à vis with current ones, we can observe significantly lower deployment of [Direct Air Cap

Direct air capture of CO2 and climate stabilization: A model based assessment http://t.co/SkyfdepQMx #climatechange