↓ Skip to main content

Impact of an early education multimedia intervention in managing nutrition-related chemotherapy side effects: a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Impact of an early education multimedia intervention in managing nutrition-related chemotherapy side effects: a pilot study
Published in
SpringerPlus, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-2-179
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie Thompson, Kathryn Silliman, Dawn E Clifford

Abstract

The purpose of the educational intervention was to measure changes in knowledge, perceived benefit of nutrition, and perceived self efficacy in handling side effects of chemotherapy before and after viewing a 15 minute DVD among patients with cancer.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 23%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 7 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 7 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2013.
All research outputs
#1,959,902
of 3,913,265 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#347
of 774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,211
of 85,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,913,265 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 774 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.