↓ Skip to main content

A July Spike in Fatal Medication Errors: A Possible Effect of New Medical Residents

Overview of attention for article published in JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 4,214)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
185 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
A July Spike in Fatal Medication Errors: A Possible Effect of New Medical Residents
Published in
JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, May 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11606-010-1356-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

David P. Phillips, Gwendolyn E. C. Barker

Abstract

Each July thousands begin medical residencies and acquire increased responsibility for patient care. Many have suggested that these new medical residents may produce errors and worsen patient outcomes-the so-called "July Effect;" however, we have found no U.S. evidence documenting this effect.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 185 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 6%
Mexico 2 3%
Belgium 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 68 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 18%
Other 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Student > Postgraduate 8 10%
Professor 7 9%
Other 27 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 64%
Social Sciences 9 12%
Unspecified 4 5%
Psychology 4 5%
Computer Science 4 5%
Other 7 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 190. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2018.
All research outputs
#57,147
of 12,019,468 outputs
Outputs from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#49
of 4,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,182
of 11,371,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#49
of 4,162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,019,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,371,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.