| Title |
Impact of native forest restoration on endemic crickets and katydids density in Rodrigues island
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Insect Conservation, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10841-012-9476-1 |
| Authors |
Sylvain Hugel |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 3 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Réunion | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 41 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 19% |
| Researcher | 9 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 53% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 26% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,752,851
of 22,901,818 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Insect Conservation
#141
of 655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,214
of 157,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Insect Conservation
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,901,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them