| Title |
Changes in the mean systemic filling pressure during a fluid challenge in postsurgical intensive care patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-013-2928-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maurizio Cecconi, Hollmann D. Aya, Martin Geisen, Claudia Ebm, Nick Fletcher, R. Michael Grounds, Andrew Rhodes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 24% |
| Belgium | 2 | 12% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 12% |
| Italy | 2 | 12% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 112 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Researcher | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 33 | 28% |
| Unknown | 9 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 72% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,841,398
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,975
of 5,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,469
of 207,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#5
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.