↓ Skip to main content

Are cash-based interventions a feasible approach for expanding humanitarian assistance in Syria?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of International Humanitarian Action, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Are cash-based interventions a feasible approach for expanding humanitarian assistance in Syria?
Published in
Journal of International Humanitarian Action, November 2016
DOI 10.1186/s41018-016-0015-7
Authors

Shannon Doocy, Hannah Tappis, Emily Lyles

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 34%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 7 24%
Arts and Humanities 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 12 41%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2017.
All research outputs
#1,094,109
of 12,169,156 outputs
Outputs from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#26
of 43 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,302
of 329,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,169,156 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one scored the same or higher as 17 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them