↓ Skip to main content

Exploding vesicles

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Systems Chemistry, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

1 blog


15 Dimensions

Readers on

51 Mendeley
Exploding vesicles
Published in
Journal of Systems Chemistry, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1759-2208-2-4

Ting F Zhu, Jack W Szostak

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Netherlands 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 47 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 41%
Student > Master 9 18%
Researcher 7 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Professor 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 15 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 22%
Engineering 7 14%
Physics and Astronomy 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 6 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2011.
All research outputs
of 3,685,046 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Systems Chemistry
of 20 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 85,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Systems Chemistry
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,685,046 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one scored the same or higher as 13 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them