Title |
A systematic revision of Capparaceae and Cleomaceae in Egypt: an evaluation of the generic delimitations of Capparis and Cleome using ecological and genetic diversity
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, October 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s43141-020-00069-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mohamed Abd. S. El zayat, Mahmoud El Sayd Ali, Mohamed Hamdy Amar |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 21% |
Researcher | 2 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
Materials Science | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2022.
All research outputs
#8,541,797
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
#55
of 348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,780
of 434,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 348 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.