Reviewers’ scores do not predict impact: bibliometric analysis of the proceedings of the human–robot interaction… https://t.co/Xzj0O1yBjv
Reviewers’ scores do not predict impact https://t.co/KmWDQvcRuq
RT @Research_Voice: Do reviewers’ scores predict the citations that papers later attract? https://t.co/ku8mxJ3t9k #peerreview #science #con…
Interesting paper on the peer reviewing process of the HRI conference https://t.co/jLawfdWFH3
RT @Research_Voice: Do reviewers’ scores predict the citations that papers later attract? https://t.co/ku8mxJ3t9k #peerreview #science #con…
Reviewers' scores accurately predicted accept/reject in 86% of cases, but were poor indicators of no. of citations: https://t.co/OdnayUC0ws https://t.co/xmIgPOFcnP
RT @Research_Voice: Do reviewers’ scores predict the citations that papers later attract? https://t.co/ku8mxJ3t9k #peerreview #science #con…
RT @Research_Voice: Do reviewers’ scores predict the citations that papers later attract? https://t.co/ku8mxJ3t9k #peerreview #science #con…
RT @Research_Voice: Do reviewers’ scores predict the citations that papers later attract? https://t.co/ku8mxJ3t9k #peerreview #science #con…
RT @Research_Voice: Do reviewers’ scores predict the citations that papers later attract? https://t.co/ku8mxJ3t9k #peerreview #science #con…
The only surprise here is the premise. WHY is peer review essential for scientific progress? Because we're to lazy to find alternative? https://t.co/MoDUEmPUDu
Reviewers’ scores do not predict impact https://t.co/k8d90g7znC
RT @SoftwareEngine0: RT Research_Voice: Do reviewers’ scores predict the citations that papers later attract? https://t.co/ksk9ItxVfF #peer…
RT @Research_Voice: Do reviewers’ scores predict the citations that papers later attract? https://t.co/ku8mxJ3t9k #peerreview #science #con…
RT @Research_Voice: Do reviewers’ scores predict the citations that papers later attract? https://t.co/ku8mxJ3t9k #peerreview #science #con…
RT @Research_Voice: Do reviewers’ scores predict the citations that papers later attract? https://t.co/ku8mxJ3t9k #peerreview #science #con…
Tid til videnskabelig refleksion: review kommentarer uden relation t impact af en given artikel #dkvid https://t.co/O8Jew7Hyxb
Unwelcome evidence: No relation between reviewers perception of paper quality & later impact #scicomm https://t.co/O8Jew7Z9VL
RT @Research_Voice: Do reviewers’ scores predict the citations that papers later attract? https://t.co/ku8mxJ3t9k #peerreview #science #con…
Do reviewers’ scores predict the citations that papers later attract? https://t.co/ku8mxJ3t9k #peerreview #science #conference @IEEEorg
Reviewers’ scores do not predict impact | SpringerLink https://t.co/96Y6ZynutC
RT @RetractionWatch: Reviewers’ scores do not predict impact, says new study https://t.co/79DlJ5Q5q2 (sub req'd) https://t.co/qulJ34GKXg
Reviewers’ scores do not predict impact: bibliometric analysis of the human–robot interaction conference https://t.co/TcroQJ3RrX
The question is do they ensure quality, leave alone predicting impact https://t.co/gG3oU2015R
RT @RetractionWatch: Reviewers’ scores do not predict impact, says new study https://t.co/79DlJ5Q5q2 (sub req'd) https://t.co/qulJ34GKXg
RT @RetractionWatch: Reviewers’ scores do not predict impact, says new study https://t.co/79DlJ5Q5q2 (sub req'd) https://t.co/qulJ34GKXg
RT @psforscher: Reviews are unrelated to later citations, at least in a sample of human-robot interaction proceedings https://t.co/kOrCCgCF…
RT @psforscher: Reviews are unrelated to later citations, at least in a sample of human-robot interaction proceedings https://t.co/kOrCCgCF…
RT @RetractionWatch: Reviewers’ scores do not predict impact, says new study https://t.co/79DlJ5Q5q2 (sub req'd) https://t.co/qulJ34GKXg
RT @RetractionWatch: Reviewers’ scores do not predict impact, says new study https://t.co/79DlJ5Q5q2 (sub req'd) https://t.co/qulJ34GKXg
Reviews are unrelated to later citations, at least in a sample of human-robot interaction proceedings https://t.co/kOrCCgCFIE
RT @RetractionWatch: Reviewers’ scores do not predict impact, says new study https://t.co/79DlJ5Q5q2 (sub req'd) https://t.co/qulJ34GKXg
RT @RetractionWatch: Reviewers’ scores do not predict impact, says new study https://t.co/79DlJ5Q5q2 (sub req'd) https://t.co/qulJ34GKXg
RT @RetractionWatch: Reviewers’ scores do not predict impact, says new study https://t.co/79DlJ5Q5q2 (sub req'd) https://t.co/qulJ34GKXg
RT @RetractionWatch: Reviewers’ scores do not predict impact, says new study https://t.co/79DlJ5Q5q2 (sub req'd) https://t.co/qulJ34GKXg
RT @JUnivRejection: Zero correlation at our journal. https://t.co/mP0ePpbljr
Zero correlation at our journal. https://t.co/mP0ePpbljr
RT @RetractionWatch: Reviewers’ scores do not predict impact, says new study https://t.co/79DlJ5Q5q2 (sub req'd) https://t.co/qulJ34GKXg
Reviewers’ scores do not predict impact, says new study https://t.co/79DlJ5Q5q2 (sub req'd) https://t.co/qulJ34GKXg