↓ Skip to main content

Formalizing value-guided argumentation for ethical systems design

Overview of attention for article published in Artificial Intelligence and Law, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Formalizing value-guided argumentation for ethical systems design
Published in
Artificial Intelligence and Law, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10506-016-9189-y
Authors

Bart Verheij

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 29%
Researcher 5 15%
Other 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 8 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 7 21%
Engineering 5 15%
Social Sciences 5 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 5 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2016.
All research outputs
#19,246,640
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Artificial Intelligence and Law
#155
of 214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,021
of 315,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Artificial Intelligence and Law
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.