Title |
A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research on the Meaning and Characteristics of Mentoring in Academic Medicine
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, November 2009
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11606-009-1165-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dario Sambunjak, Sharon E. Straus, Ana Marusic |
Abstract |
Mentorship is perceived to play a significant role in the career development and productivity of academic clinicians, but little is known about the characteristics of mentorship. This knowledge would be useful for those developing mentorship programs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 50% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Canada | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 458 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 2% |
South Africa | 3 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Turkey | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Other | 5 | 1% |
Unknown | 433 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 60 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 11% |
Researcher | 48 | 10% |
Other | 38 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 36 | 8% |
Other | 148 | 32% |
Unknown | 78 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 186 | 41% |
Social Sciences | 49 | 11% |
Psychology | 31 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 23 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 4% |
Other | 62 | 14% |
Unknown | 88 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,118,698
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#938
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,382
of 171,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.