Cameron’s information disaster in the referendum of 2016: an exit from Brexit?

#Obama deserves praise for overcoming the #bankingcrisis+ #healthcarereforms; and he supported the EU, No to #BREXIT https://t.co/ryIU820ySs https://t.co/8QYYNm2iYP

This is full nonsense! Clearly, different dynamics of #BREXIT(orderly referendum would have been pro #EU) and #Trump https://t.co/ryIU820ySs https://t.co/OFKwUOEXud

The main #BREXIT factor is #Cameron's non-inclusion of #Treasury info in gov. brochure 16pp: Brexit=10% income loss; https://t.co/ryIU820ySs https://t.co/BR22AZQBWk

#BREXIT #referendum has no legitimacy. https://t.co/ryIU820ySs, details in book BREXIT aus Versehen; forthcoming in English in spring 2017 https://t.co/LSK95cJJnD

EU facing new problems;#BREXIT undermines EU stability https://t.co/ryIU820ySs president #Trump welcomes BREXIT=selfdestruction of the #West https://t.co/ZIfEslHdA4

RT @ProfPaulWelfens: #BREXIT Forum mit #HaroldJames, Princeton University und P. #Welfens: Engl. paper - kostenlos download bis 15.117 ht…

many new insights on a disorganized #UK #EUreferendum -an orderly referendum would have brought 52 percent for remain!#Cameron/#May policy!? https://t.co/XfCZi8kKjD

#BREXIT Forum mit #HaroldJames, Princeton University und P. #Welfens: Engl. paper - kostenlos download bis 15.117 https://t.co/ryIU820ySs

New analytical results on #UK referendum: deeply flawed by #Cameron's non-inclusion of 10% GDP loss scenario(UK Treasury study) in brochure https://t.co/6x5y36StKv

Cameron’s information disaster in the referendum of 2016: an exit from #Brexit? free access until 15 Jan 2017 https://t.co/61ksnLDFbx

Mrs.#May stands for an inconsistent policy-her sentence #BREXIT is BREXIT and we will make a success of it, is wrong https://t.co/ryIU820ySs https://t.co/yv2FILuvAB

@POTUS #Obama was supportive of #EU28, against a naive #BREXIT project that reflects #Cameron's unprofessional work https://t.co/lXsU8QNLr9

maybe,but #Cameron was even re-elected, his info blunder brought #BREXIT,correct info would have brought 52.1 pro EU https://t.co/lXsU8QNLr9 https://t.co/DyLe0UcSQ3

Important contribution to #monetary policy and the #stockmarket - crucial research. Seen as add. points #BREXITForum https://t.co/lXsU8R5miH https://t.co/iUqDntmqxw

End of #May?#Cameron's blunder/#referendum=no info on output loss for households;correct result would be 52% pro #EU https://t.co/lXsU8QNLr9

"A new, very convincing argument for a second (#Brexit) #referendum" https://t.co/61ksnLDFbx