Title |
Evaluation of question-listing at the Cancer Support Community
|
---|---|
Published in |
Translational Behavioral Medicine, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s13142-012-0186-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jeff Belkora, Melissa Miller, Bonnie Crawford, Kathleen Coyne, Margaret Stauffer, Joanne Buzaglo, Natasha Blakeney, Margo Michaels, Mitch Golant |
Abstract |
The Cancer Support Community (CSC) provides psychosocial support to people facing cancer in community settings. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the compatibility, effectiveness, and fidelity of the Situation-Choices-Objectives-People-Evaluation-Decisions (SCOPED) question-listing intervention at three CSC sites. Between August 2008 and August 2011, the Program Director at each CSC site implemented question-listing, while measuring patient distress, anxiety, and self-efficacy before and after each intervention. We analyzed the quantitative results using unadjusted statistical tests and reviewed qualitative comments by patients and the case notes of Program Directors to assess compatibility and fidelity. Program Directors implemented question-listing with 77 blood cancer patients. Patients reported decreased distress (p = 0.009) and anxiety (p = 0.005) and increased self-efficacy (p < 0.001). Patients and Program Directors endorsed the intervention as compatible with CSC's mission and approach and feasible to implement with high fidelity. CSC effectively translated SCOPED question-listing into practice in the context of its community-based psychosocial support services at three sites. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 7 | 25% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 14% |
Researcher | 4 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 6 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 11% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 8 | 29% |