↓ Skip to main content

Comparing Robustness of Pairwise and Multiclass Neural-Network Systems for Face Recognition

Overview of attention for article published in arXiv, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Comparing Robustness of Pairwise and Multiclass Neural-Network Systems for Face Recognition
Published in
arXiv, December 2007
DOI 10.1155/2008/468693
Authors

J. Uglov, L. Jakaite, V. Schetinin, C. Maple

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Ireland 1 5%
Canada 1 5%
Unknown 16 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 16%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 7 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 7 37%
Engineering 3 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Mathematics 1 5%
Unknown 7 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2013.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#356,026
of 914,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,555
of 166,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#358
of 470 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 914,120 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 470 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.