↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Mathematical Geology, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Published in
Mathematical Geology, January 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1007531524040
Authors

Per Christiansen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
New Zealand 1 3%
Unknown 24 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Master 4 14%
Professor 3 10%
Unspecified 3 10%
Other 9 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 41%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 21%
Unspecified 3 10%
Environmental Science 3 10%
Engineering 3 10%
Other 2 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2018.
All research outputs
#799,333
of 13,516,287 outputs
Outputs from Mathematical Geology
#1
of 88 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,611
of 148,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mathematical Geology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,516,287 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 88 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them