Perpetuation of retracted publications is a problem. The use of retracted findings for interpretation and discussion in subsequent publications poses the risk of drawing false and, for example in medical research, even harmful conclusions. https://t.co/vod
RT @MicrobiomDigest: @CienciaxPueblo @schneiderleonid @SmutClyde @RetractionWatch But all kidding aside, there are several studies on how o…
@CienciaxPueblo @schneiderleonid @SmutClyde @RetractionWatch But all kidding aside, there are several studies on how often retracted papers still get cited. Some examples: * https://t.co/gF3ciuCCPj * https://t.co/juJgult6kV * https://t.co/dbqxB1VVWB * htt
Day 4: sorry, backtrack a bit to Day 2. I forgot the other Bornemann-Cimenti paper published recently, which is a very solid general guide to 'Why do some retracted papers continue to be cited?' I mean, you'd hope so - that's the title. https://t.co/Jv80
Why do some retracted papers continue to be cited? | Scientometrics https://t.co/gL3VMCAhQk publishing process, #retraction #citation
Why do some retracted papers continue to be cited? | Scientometrics https://t.co/jZgsKGmvsz #citation #publishing process
#repositories and other databases may be perpetuating continued citation of retracted articles https://t.co/pijguSPsFO
RT @fcohenadad: Why do some retracted papers continue to be cited? | Scientometrics https://t.co/5c8dJiNqVZ #citation #retraction #referenc…
Why do some retracted papers continue to be cited? | Scientometrics https://t.co/5c8dJiNqVZ #citation #retraction #reference #management
Why do some retracted papers continue to be cited? https://t.co/PkiiCz4i7Q