↓ Skip to main content

Utility of thromboelastogram in cardiac surgery in Jacobsen syndrome associated with platelet dysfunction: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in JA Clinical Reports, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 134)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
Title
Utility of thromboelastogram in cardiac surgery in Jacobsen syndrome associated with platelet dysfunction: a case report
Published in
JA Clinical Reports, August 2022
DOI 10.1186/s40981-022-00557-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chikashi Takeda, Akiko Hirotsu, Gento Yasuhara, Akito Mizuno, Kenichiro Tatsumi, Shuji Kawamoto

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,062,719
of 22,562,129 outputs
Outputs from JA Clinical Reports
#19
of 134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,372
of 340,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JA Clinical Reports
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,562,129 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 134 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them