@PhilAlz @EJNeuroscience @RetractionWatch @cpiller @JohnnyFoxe @schrag_matthew @MicrobiomDigest I would reply, but your coauthor doubts that alter-egos or names that aren't on one's passport have any legitimate place in criticism of fake science. https://t
#94 there’s the other side of anonymity of course which should be considered https://t.co/c7sQCXq5Ad https://t.co/aQXValPCbg
RT @vaughanbell: Are Pseudonyms Ethical in (Science) Publishing? @Neuro_Skeptic as a Case Study https://t.co/ZKIQVH9bhn Weak paper but cong…
@Neuro_Skeptic Because the paper @JKAronson (who wrote this paper, so you can just ask him here directly) cites, namely this one: https://t.co/AFmiKfPV0G already cites your paper? idk. Also, have this @SMBCComics that Jason Kodat (whom I can't find on twit
@Neuro_Skeptic has been subject to research - a case study https://t.co/QL7wrYMqy0
RT @vaughanbell: Are Pseudonyms Ethical in (Science) Publishing? @Neuro_Skeptic as a Case Study https://t.co/ZKIQVH9bhn Weak paper but cong…
RT @vaughanbell: Are Pseudonyms Ethical in (Science) Publishing? @Neuro_Skeptic as a Case Study https://t.co/ZKIQVH9bhn Weak paper but cong…
RT @autismcrisis: Meanwhile, an influential autism ABA manual is edited by a pseudonym, who also authored an autism paper https://t.co/QNzs…
RT @autismcrisis: Meanwhile, an influential autism ABA manual is edited by a pseudonym, who also authored an autism paper https://t.co/QNzs…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: This is a first: a paper about my blog. "Are Pseudonyms Ethical in (Science) Publishing? Neuroskeptic as a Case Study" h…
Se även: https://t.co/yPkIzOQ13c
RT @vaughanbell: Are Pseudonyms Ethical in (Science) Publishing? @Neuro_Skeptic as a Case Study https://t.co/ZKIQVH9bhn Weak paper but cong…
RT @vaughanbell: Are Pseudonyms Ethical in (Science) Publishing? @Neuro_Skeptic as a Case Study https://t.co/ZKIQVH9bhn Weak paper but cong…
RT @pitiklinov: ¿Son éticos los pseudónimos cuando se publica sobre ciencia? el caso de Neuroskeptic https://t.co/SdIjLoXiBV
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: This is a first: a paper about my blog. "Are Pseudonyms Ethical in (Science) Publishing? Neuroskeptic as a Case Study" h…
Akademien har en besynnerlig syn på åsikter och debatt. Case in point: https://t.co/yPkIzOQ13c
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: This is a first: a paper about my blog. "Are Pseudonyms Ethical in (Science) Publishing? Neuroskeptic as a Case Study" h…
LMAOOOOOOO https://t.co/kOikFJR3gi
RT @autismcrisis: Meanwhile, an influential autism ABA manual is edited by a pseudonym, who also authored an autism paper https://t.co/QNzs…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: This is a first: a paper about my blog. "Are Pseudonyms Ethical in (Science) Publishing? Neuroskeptic as a Case Study" h…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: This is a first: a paper about my blog. "Are Pseudonyms Ethical in (Science) Publishing? Neuroskeptic as a Case Study" h…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: This is a first: a paper about my blog. "Are Pseudonyms Ethical in (Science) Publishing? Neuroskeptic as a Case Study" h…
Meanwhile, an influential autism ABA manual is edited by a pseudonym, who also authored an autism paper https://t.co/QNzsBUdiJB no one cares
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: This is a first: a paper about my blog. "Are Pseudonyms Ethical in (Science) Publishing? Neuroskeptic as a Case Study" h…
RT @olavoamaral: if anonymous censorship (aka "peer review") is ok, why should science worry about anonymous authors? Kind of weird. https:…
if anonymous censorship (aka "peer review") is ok, why should science worry about anonymous authors? Kind of weird. https://t.co/zxjxRG6gbd
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: This is a first: a paper about my blog. "Are Pseudonyms Ethical in (Science) Publishing? Neuroskeptic as a Case Study" h…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: This is a first: a paper about my blog. "Are Pseudonyms Ethical in (Science) Publishing? Neuroskeptic as a Case Study" h…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: This is a first: a paper about my blog. "Are Pseudonyms Ethical in (Science) Publishing? Neuroskeptic as a Case Study" h…
RT @pitiklinov: ¿Son éticos los pseudónimos cuando se publica sobre ciencia? el caso de Neuroskeptic https://t.co/SdIjLoXiBV
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: This is a first: a paper about my blog. "Are Pseudonyms Ethical in (Science) Publishing? Neuroskeptic as a Case Study" h…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: This is a first: a paper about my blog. "Are Pseudonyms Ethical in (Science) Publishing? Neuroskeptic as a Case Study" h…
RT @pitiklinov: ¿Son éticos los pseudónimos cuando se publica sobre ciencia? el caso de Neuroskeptic https://t.co/SdIjLoXiBV
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: This is a first: a paper about my blog. "Are Pseudonyms Ethical in (Science) Publishing? Neuroskeptic as a Case Study" h…
¿Son éticos los pseudónimos cuando se publica sobre ciencia? el caso de Neuroskeptic https://t.co/SdIjLoXiBV
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: This is a first: a paper about my blog. "Are Pseudonyms Ethical in (Science) Publishing? Neuroskeptic as a Case Study" h…
This is a first: a paper about my blog. "Are Pseudonyms Ethical in (Science) Publishing? Neuroskeptic as a Case Study" https://t.co/y4OYM7iyDy
Are Pseudonyms Ethical in (Science) Publishing? @Neuro_Skeptic as a Case Study https://t.co/ZKIQVH9bhn Weak paper but congrats!
Are Pseudonyms Ethical in (Science) Publishing? Neuroskeptic as a Case Study https://t.co/KPwLddnZJr @Neuro_Skeptic working on response now?
↓RTしたやつ。Neuroskepticさんって匿名で正体不明だったのね。知らなかった。私と同じ。科学で偽名の使用は倫理的か?Are Pseudonyms Ethical in (Science) Publishing? https://t.co/xVLp5DpJFb
RT @DegenRolf: Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva mouths off about @Neuro_Skeptic in academic paper. https://t.co/AYI3BYSqX2 https://t.co/w3dvxCf9…
Neuro_Skeptic: RT DegenRolf: Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva mouths off about Neuro_Skeptic in academic paper. … https://t.co/L085fUZRyD
RT @DegenRolf: Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva mouths off about @Neuro_Skeptic in academic paper. https://t.co/AYI3BYSqX2 https://t.co/w3dvxCf9…
Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva mouths off about @Neuro_Skeptic in academic paper. https://t.co/AYI3BYSqX2 https://t.co/w3dvxCf9bH