↓ Skip to main content

The Visual Light Curve Of C/1995 O1 (Hale-Bopp) From Discovery To Late 1997

Overview of attention for article published in Earth, Moon, and Planets, January 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
25 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
The Visual Light Curve Of C/1995 O1 (Hale-Bopp) From Discovery To Late 1997
Published in
Earth, Moon, and Planets, January 1997
DOI 10.1023/a:1006228113533
Authors

M. R. Kidger, G. Hurst, N. James

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,296,727
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Moon, and Planets
#76
of 324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,667
of 92,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Moon, and Planets
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.