↓ Skip to main content

Pediatric emergency medicine point-of-care ultrasound: summary of the evidence

Overview of attention for article published in The Ultrasound Journal, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
101 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
150 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
265 Mendeley
Title
Pediatric emergency medicine point-of-care ultrasound: summary of the evidence
Published in
The Ultrasound Journal, November 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13089-016-0049-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer R. Marin, Alyssa M. Abo, Alexander C. Arroyo, Stephanie J. Doniger, Jason W. Fischer, Rachel Rempell, Brandi Gary, James F. Holmes, David O. Kessler, Samuel H. F. Lam, Marla C. Levine, Jason A. Levy, Alice Murray, Lorraine Ng, Vicki E. Noble, Daniela Ramirez-Schrempp, David C. Riley, Turandot Saul, Vaishali Shah, Adam B. Sivitz, Ee Tein Tay, David Teng, Lindsey Chaudoin, James W. Tsung, Rebecca L. Vieira, Yaffa M. Vitberg, Resa E. Lewiss

Abstract

The utility of point-of-care ultrasound is well supported by the medical literature. Consequently, pediatric emergency medicine providers have embraced this technology in everyday practice. Recently, the American Academy of Pediatrics published a policy statement endorsing the use of point-of-care ultrasound by pediatric emergency medicine providers.  To date, there is no standard guideline for the practice of point-of-care ultrasound for this specialty. This document serves as an initial step in the detailed "how to" and description of individual point-of-care ultrasound examinations.  Pediatric emergency medicine providers should refer to this paper as reference for published research, objectives for learners, and standardized reporting guidelines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 101 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 264 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 47 18%
Student > Postgraduate 30 11%
Researcher 23 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 7%
Student > Bachelor 16 6%
Other 61 23%
Unknown 69 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 135 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 4%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 85 32%