| Title |
Low-dose intravenous plus inhaled versus intravenous polymyxin B for the treatment of extensive drug-resistant Gram-negative ventilator-associated pneumonia in the critical illnesses: a multi-center matched case–control study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-022-01033-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jiao Liu, Min Shao, Qianghong Xu, Fen Liu, Xiaojun Pan, Jianfeng Wu, Lihong Xiong, Yueming Wu, Mi Tian, Jianying Yao, Sisi Huang, Lidi Zhang, Yizhu Chen, Sheng Zhang, Zhenliang Wen, Hangxiang Du, TaoWang, Yongan Liu, Wenzhe Li, Yan Xu, Jean-louis Teboul, Dechang Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 20% |
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| Japan | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 25% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 17% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,182,291
of 23,230,825 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#383
of 1,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,346
of 433,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#15
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,230,825 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.