↓ Skip to main content

Comparability of a provisioned device versus bring your own device for completion of patient-reported outcome measures by participants with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: qualitative…

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Comparability of a provisioned device versus bring your own device for completion of patient-reported outcome measures by participants with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: qualitative interview findings
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, August 2022
DOI 10.1186/s41687-022-00492-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Louise Newton, Oliver Knight-West, Sonya Eremenco, Stacie Hudgens, Mabel Crescioni, Tara Symonds, David S. Reasner, Bill Byrom, Paul O’Donohoe, Susan Vallow

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Other 1 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 3 75%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2022.
All research outputs
#13,560,946
of 24,219,576 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#181
of 578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,085
of 420,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,219,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.