↓ Skip to main content

Qualitative interviews in patients with lipodystrophy to assess the patient experience: evaluation of hunger and other symptoms

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Qualitative interviews in patients with lipodystrophy to assess the patient experience: evaluation of hunger and other symptoms
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, July 2022
DOI 10.1186/s41687-022-00486-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan A. Martin, Robert J. Sanchez, Oyebimpe Olayinka-Amao, Charles Harris, Sheri Fehnel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Other 2 40%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 40%
Computer Science 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2022.
All research outputs
#18,565,641
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#392
of 502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#298,656
of 431,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#19
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 502 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,258 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.