↓ Skip to main content

Fault source model for the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake sequence based on ALOS-2/PALSAR-2 pixel-offset data: evidence for dynamic slip partitioning

Overview of attention for article published in Earth, Planets and Space, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Fault source model for the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake sequence based on ALOS-2/PALSAR-2 pixel-offset data: evidence for dynamic slip partitioning
Published in
Earth, Planets and Space, October 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40623-016-0545-7
Authors

Yuji Himematsu, Masato Furuya

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 21 55%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 11 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2016.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#1,431
of 1,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#282,706
of 323,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#29
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.