| Title |
Cystic liver lesions: a pictorial review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Insights into Imaging, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13244-022-01242-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mégane Chenin, Anita Paisant, Jérôme Lebigot, Paul Bazeries, Kawtar Debbi, Maxime Ronot, Valérie Laurent, Christophe Aubé |
| Abstract |
Hepatic cysts (HC) are sac-like structures mainly filled with liquid and showing a distinct membrane. They are usually found incidentally through imaging. A wide spectrum of imaging patterns may be observed for common and uncommon, neoplastic and non-neoplastic diseases. While simple hepatic cysts occur frequently and do not require any treatment or follow-up, non-typical cysts should be carefully analysed to avoid misdiagnosing a lesion that would require appropriate management. Therefore, adequate knowledge of all the relevant imaging patterns is critical to secure an accurate diagnosis. The aim of this review is to describe the imaging features of the different types of hepatic cysts. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 4 | 20% |
| Spain | 2 | 10% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Austria | 1 | 5% |
| Argentina | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 65% |
| Scientists | 4 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 22% |
| Professor | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,855,197
of 25,646,963 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#79
of 1,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,485
of 437,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#3
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,646,963 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.