↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of Meridian Flow Direction by Electrical Stimulation Method

Overview of attention for article published in Discover Nano, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Analysis of Meridian Flow Direction by Electrical Stimulation Method
Published in
Discover Nano, July 2022
DOI 10.1186/s11671-022-03694-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yan-Wen Liu, Chuan-Wei Kuo, Ting-Chang Chang, Yu-Chiang Hung, Yung-Fang Tan, Chia-Chuan Wu, Chien-Hung Lin, Wen-Chung Chen, Wen-Long Hu, Tsung-Ming Tsai

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2022.
All research outputs
#14,614,797
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Discover Nano
#464
of 1,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,932
of 437,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Discover Nano
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,150 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.