↓ Skip to main content

Respiratory support strategy in adults with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in JA Clinical Reports, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 148)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Respiratory support strategy in adults with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Published in
JA Clinical Reports, May 2022
DOI 10.1186/s40981-022-00525-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiromu Okano, Masaaki Sakuraya, Tomoyuki Masuyama, Shunsuke Kimata, Satoshi Hokari

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 13%
Unspecified 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 8 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 17%
Unspecified 2 9%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2022.
All research outputs
#3,727,977
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from JA Clinical Reports
#4
of 148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,473
of 439,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JA Clinical Reports
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 148 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them