Title |
Foot skin depots of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose do not enable PET/CT lymphography of the lower extremity lymphatic system in man
|
---|---|
Published in |
EJNMMI Research, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/2191-219x-3-17 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mads Radmer Jensen, Lene Simonsen, Markus Lonsdale, Jens Bjørn Bülow |
Abstract |
In mice, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) lymphography enables detailed imaging of the lymphatic system and quantification of lymph node function. If this applies to humans, it may improve staging of several malignancies. The aim of this study was to elucidate whether foot skin depots of 18F-FDG make PET/CT imaging of the lower extremity lymphatic system possible in man. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 60% |
Professor | 1 | 20% |
Other | 1 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2013.
All research outputs
#20,185,720
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from EJNMMI Research
#384
of 555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,811
of 196,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EJNMMI Research
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 555 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.