Title |
Efficient production of methane from artificial garbage waste by a cylindrical bioelectrochemical reactor containing carbon fiber textiles
|
---|---|
Published in |
AMB Express, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/2191-0855-3-17 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Daisuke Sasaki, Kengo Sasaki, Atsushi Watanabe, Masahiko Morita, Yasuo Igarashi, Naoya Ohmura |
Abstract |
A cylindrical bioelectrochemical reactor (BER) containing carbon fiber textiles (CFT; BER + CFT) has characteristics of bioelectrochemical and packed-bed systems. In this study, utility of a cylindrical BER + CFT for degradation of a garbage slurry and recovery of biogas was investigated by applying 10% dog food slurry. The working electrode potential was electrochemically regulated at -0.8 V (vs. Ag/AgCl). Stable methane production of 9.37 L-CH4 · L-1 · day-1 and dichromate chemical oxygen demand (CODcr) removal of 62.5% were observed, even at a high organic loading rate (OLR) of 89.3 g-CODcr · L-1 · day-1. Given energy as methane (372.6 kJ · L-1 · day-1) was much higher than input electric energy to the working electrode (0.6 kJ · L-1 · day-1) at this OLR. Methanogens were highly retained in CFT by direct attachment to the cathodic working electrodes (52.3%; ratio of methanogens to prokaryotes), compared with the suspended fraction (31.2%), probably contributing to the acceleration of organic material degradation and removal of organic acids. These results provide insight into the application of cylindrical BER + CFT in efficient methane production from garbage waste including a high percentage of solid fraction. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sweden | 1 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | 3% |
Belgium | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 32 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 29% |
Researcher | 10 | 29% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 4 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 12 | 34% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 11% |
Engineering | 3 | 9% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 17% |
Unknown | 4 | 11% |