↓ Skip to main content

How well do practicing radiologists interpret the results of CAD technology? A quantitative characterization

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
How well do practicing radiologists interpret the results of CAD technology? A quantitative characterization
Published in
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, June 2022
DOI 10.1186/s41235-022-00375-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fallon Branch, K. Matthew Williams, Isabella Noel Santana, Jay Hegdé

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Unknown 7 78%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Unknown 7 78%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2022.
All research outputs
#20,944,189
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#310
of 329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#356,528
of 443,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#21
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.