↓ Skip to main content

Gabapentin does not improve multimodal analgesia outcomes for total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Gabapentin does not improve multimodal analgesia outcomes for total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12630-013-9902-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

James E. Paul, Manyat Nantha-Aree, Norman Buckley, Ji Cheng, Lehana Thabane, Antonella Tidy, Justin DeBeer, Mitchell Winemaker, David Wismer, Dinshaw Punthakee, Victoria Avram

Abstract

This study assessed whether gabapentin given preoperatively and for two days postoperatively (in addition to patient-controlled analgesia [PCA] morphine, acetaminophen, and ketorolac) is effective in reducing morphine requirements and moderating pain scores when compared with placebo for primary total knee arthroplasty.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 73 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 14%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 20 27%
Unknown 17 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 19 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2017.
All research outputs
#7,355,005
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#1,213
of 2,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,042
of 208,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#6
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.