↓ Skip to main content

Gabapentin does not improve multimodal analgesia outcomes for total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Gabapentin does not improve multimodal analgesia outcomes for total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12630-013-9902-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

James E. Paul, Manyat Nantha-Aree, Norman Buckley, Ji Cheng, Lehana Thabane, Antonella Tidy, Justin DeBeer, Mitchell Winemaker, David Wismer, Dinshaw Punthakee, Victoria Avram

Abstract

This study assessed whether gabapentin given preoperatively and for two days postoperatively (in addition to patient-controlled analgesia [PCA] morphine, acetaminophen, and ketorolac) is effective in reducing morphine requirements and moderating pain scores when compared with placebo for primary total knee arthroplasty.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 49 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 20%
Student > Master 7 14%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Other 17 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 68%
Unspecified 7 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2014.
All research outputs
#8,173,871
of 13,036,608 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia
#1,203
of 1,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,510
of 144,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia
#15
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,036,608 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.