| Title |
Trash Taxonomy Tool: harmonizing classification systems used to describe trash in environments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microplastics and Nanoplastics, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s43591-022-00035-1 |
| Authors |
Hannah Hapich, Win Cowger, Andrew Gray, Neil Tangri, Tony Hale, Amr Magdy, Antoinette Vermilye, Walter Yu, Dick Ayres, Charles Moore, John Vermilye, Samiksha Singh, Aaron N. K. Haiman, Kathryn Youngblood, Yunfan Kang, Margaret McCauley, Trevor Lok, Shelly Moore, Eric Baggs, Sherry Lippiatt, Peter Kohler, Gary Conley, Janna Taing, Jeremiah Mock |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 46% |
| Canada | 2 | 8% |
| Germany | 2 | 8% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 19% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 14 | 54% |
| Members of the public | 12 | 46% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 4 | 24% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,092,450
of 25,218,929 outputs
Outputs from Microplastics and Nanoplastics
#26
of 55 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,410
of 437,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microplastics and Nanoplastics
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,218,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 55 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.