↓ Skip to main content

Onset Detection in Surface Electromyographic Signals: A Systematic Comparison of Methods

Overview of attention for article published in ADS, June 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
157 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Onset Detection in Surface Electromyographic Signals: A Systematic Comparison of Methods
Published in
ADS, June 2001
DOI 10.1155/s1110865701000191
Authors

Gerhard Staude, Claus Flachenecker, Martin Daumer, Werner Wolf

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 2%
United States 3 2%
Chile 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Serbia 1 <1%
Unknown 164 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 19%
Researcher 32 18%
Student > Master 26 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Other 38 22%
Unknown 17 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 60 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 13%
Neuroscience 15 9%
Sports and Recreations 15 9%
Computer Science 13 7%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 28 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2022.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#7,546
of 26,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,683
of 42,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#5
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.