| Title |
L-citrulline production by metabolically engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum from glucose and alternative carbon sources
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
AMB Express, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13568-014-0085-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dorit Eberhardt, Jaide V K Jensen, Volker F Wendisch |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 39 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 30% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 23% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 8% |
| Researcher | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 20% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2022.
All research outputs
#7,729,051
of 23,504,998 outputs
Outputs from AMB Express
#197
of 1,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,844
of 364,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AMB Express
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,504,998 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,253 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.