@a_lisinski @CVolkmannMD @sameerjauhar @f_hieronymus @EikoFried @JakobKaminski @joannamoncrieff @JDaviesPhD @ReadReadj @DrDavidHealy @And_Cipriani @Toshi_FRKW Yes they can, as various authors pointed out (see e.g. https://t.co/uJOtDtm1PJ)! Why do you insis
Determination of the Clinical Importance of Study Results. A review 2002 https://t.co/TqBvil0TO3
@chadinabhan @VinayPrasad82 @AmeetSarpatwari @oncology_bg @lucadf @miljko @Prof_IanD @BMJRtoP @drdgoldstein @WilliamDale_MD @ken_rothman C 'Determination of the Clinical Importance of Study Results' https://t.co/yGNJtOv683 via @AndreasLaupacis
$ATNM http://t.co/PRUrSHWG8T On one level Iomab-B may have already met a clinical statistical difference vs chemo (10 vs 28+ days to HSCT).
@PWGTennant @EvanAckermann But statistical sig is not clin sig http://t.co/wc9VaogIbr
Rosenbek provides useful reference: clinical significance is not synonymous with statistical significance #SPAconf http://t.co/Bq1lhXPrNn
Rosenbek provides useful reference: clinical significance is not synonymous with statistical significance #SPAconf http://t.co/Bq1lhXPrNn
Rosenbek provides useful reference: clinical significance is not synonymous with statistical significance #SPAconf http://t.co/Bq1lhXPrNn
Review..determination between statistically significant and clinically relevant http://t.co/rET1tjZ0YX
@painfultweets @bodyinmind This looks like a good review http://t.co/e56WSr6gAN