↓ Skip to main content

How do osteoporosis patients perceive their illness and treatment? Implications for clinical practice

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Osteoporosis, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
How do osteoporosis patients perceive their illness and treatment? Implications for clinical practice
Published in
Archives of Osteoporosis, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11657-012-0089-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Jane Besser, Janet E. Anderson, John Weinman

Abstract

Non-adherence inhibits successful treatment of osteoporosis. This study used a theoretical framework to explore osteoporosis patients' cognitive and emotional representations of their illness and medication, using both interviews and drawing. We recorded some misconceptions patients have about their condition and medication which could act as barriers to treatment adherence.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Egypt 1 1%
Unknown 72 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 20%
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Master 9 12%
Other 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 20 26%
Unknown 6 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 28%
Psychology 15 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 11 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2012.
All research outputs
#20,185,720
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Osteoporosis
#494
of 635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,956
of 164,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Osteoporosis
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.