↓ Skip to main content

Radar detection with the Neyman–Pearson criterion using supervised-learning-machines trained with the cross-entropy error

Overview of attention for article published in ADS, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Radar detection with the Neyman–Pearson criterion using supervised-learning-machines trained with the cross-entropy error
Published in
ADS, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1687-6180-2013-44
Authors

María-Pilar Jarabo-Amores, David de la Mata-Moya, Roberto Gil-Pita, Manuel Rosa-Zurera

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 11%
Unknown 8 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 33%
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Researcher 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 22%
Physics and Astronomy 2 22%
Arts and Humanities 1 11%
Computer Science 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2013.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#24,238
of 25,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,250
of 208,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#552
of 615 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 615 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.