↓ Skip to main content

Enzymatic and non-enzymatic comparison of two different industrial tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) varieties against drought stress

Overview of attention for article published in Botanical Studies, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 188)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Enzymatic and non-enzymatic comparison of two different industrial tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) varieties against drought stress
Published in
Botanical Studies, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40529-017-0186-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Özge Çelik, Alp Ayan, Çimen Atak

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 24 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 14%
Unspecified 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 25 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,838,109
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Botanical Studies
#25
of 188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,201
of 327,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Botanical Studies
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 188 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.