| Title |
Vegetation type conversion in the US Southwest: frontline observations and management responses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Fire Ecology, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s42408-022-00131-w |
| Authors |
Christopher H. Guiterman, Rachel M. Gregg, Laura A. E. Marshall, Jill J. Beckmann, Phillip J. van Mantgem, Donald A. Falk, Jon E. Keeley, Anthony C. Caprio, Jonathan D. Coop, Paula J. Fornwalt, Collin Haffey, R. Keala Hagmann, Stephen T. Jackson, Ann M. Lynch, Ellis Q. Margolis, Christopher Marks, Marc D. Meyer, Hugh Safford, Alexandra Dunya Syphard, Alan Taylor, Craig Wilcox, Dennis Carril, Carolyn A. F. Enquist, David Huffman, Jose Iniguez, Nicole A. Molinari, Christina Restaino, Jens T. Stevens |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 20% |
| Spain | 4 | 9% |
| Canada | 4 | 9% |
| South Africa | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Equatorial Guinea | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 21 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 72% |
| Scientists | 12 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 18 | 39% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 11% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 19 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,265,750
of 25,182,110 outputs
Outputs from Fire Ecology
#32
of 237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,801
of 434,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fire Ecology
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,182,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 237 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.